Belgium sees the adoption of an EU Indo-Pacific strategy as a chance to manage the transatlantic alliance and develop an anti-China strategic tool. The Belgian government causes that it is best to keep its associates close and its enemies closer – within the sense that energetic engagement with China ought to assist it monitor the country’s stand up shut. Belgium needs to type key partnerships with democracies in the Indo-Pacific, together with the United States, India, Japan, South Korea, and Australia. Although Vienna remains cautious of free trade agreements normally, it might choose to pursue a bilateral FTA between Brussels and Beijing quite than an all-encompassing one in the Indo-Pacific. The EU’s long-term strategic approach to the Indo-Pacific will need to account for these drivers. Concerns about China appear to shape all the views that member states expressed on the potential elements of Europe’s future engagement with the region.
The idea of connectivity is yet to turn out to be properly established in France; its policy definition still largely focuses on particular person phrases similar to “infrastructure” or “transport”. As a end result, in France connectivity is known as a loosely defined term encompassing all of the above, but which is but to be taken up by a centralised policy agency. In the actual Indo-Pacific context, senior officers in France largely interpret the notion of connectivity as a response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Through work on connectivity, France would pursue the protection of sea lines of communication and would help all efforts to preserve a free maritime house for trade. While there isn’t a established set of priorities in France – different ministries prioritise completely different agendas within the area – energy, local weather, and digital security are likely to be priorities in the lengthy run, while short-term targets will include the bringing forward of infrastructure projects.